Plato and Aristotle: An Analysis Essay

Determining the beaver puzzle out of semipolitical association was important to the ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle, and apiece of them expressed his opinion in important works such(prenominal) as the Republic and Politics. In explaining, comparing, and contrasting the political philosophies of Plato and Aristotle, it is evident that each of them share the similar goal of identifying and promoting the lift out form of political govern ment. They as well as shared in common the same philosophy regarding the origins of a political state. The state of matter arises, Plato says through Socrates in the Republic, out of the needs of mankind. (Plato) Aristotle agrees, and declares that the state is a political jumpnership that exists for purposes of self-sufficiency as well as for the sake of surviving well. In other words, the State exists in order to provide for the eudaimonia of its citizens. Aristotle expresses this in Politics when he argues, the good life story is the purpose of the city-state. (Aristotle) Further more than, twain Aristotle and Plato agreed that Man is by nature a political animal, because he has the ability to express his thoughts about justice.Their respective analyses reflected their respect for justice, and their elevation of it to the highest priority. In the Republic, Plato defines just political normal as a system in which each interest is satisfied to the proper extent and eitherone has what is theirs. The philosophers have the companionship they want the warriors have the honors they want and the commoners have the goods and pleasures they want, under the enlightened centering of philosophers and warriors. The methods of Aristotle and Plato were similar in many ways.They two utilized logic, evaluations of contemporary politics, and extended comparisons of various types of political influence to arrive at their conclusions. As citizens of ancient Greece, they both shared much the same outlook on soci ety, religion, morality, and politics. They as well as shared similar historical perspectives, and their perceptions of contemporary events were formed through the same philosophical context. One of the contrasts between their methods is that Plato used analogies to make his points.He examined a political state by comparing the state with the human soul. dissimilar Aristotle, he also used a style of approach in which he made his points through dialogues involving Socrates. He also designed an standard state run by throng he referred to as The Guardians which differed from Aristotles approach in Politics, in which style and form more about resembled an essay or monologue. In Politics, Aristotle emphasized that correct political convening involves pursuing policies which are to the common advantage of the more or less people.Aristotle reasoned that dominions who fixed their own interests above everyone elses had no political legitimacy, for their tyranny brought scummy upon their own people. Aristotle describe the outflank forms of political rule as kingship, noblesse and polity, and expound the worst forms as tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. Plato was also harshly critical of tyranny, and described it in the Republic as, not a matter of minor thievery and violence, but of wholesale plunder, sacred and profane, private or public. (Plato) Both mens methods involved a comprehensive analysis of the consequences of each form of rule.Aristotle criticized Democracy because its consequences were rule by the multitude, which causes injustice. He criticized Oligarchy because its consequences were rule by the wealthy, which also causes injustice and he criticized Tyranny because its consequences were dictatorship, which again causes injustice. In terms of the merits of the citizenry, Aristotle notes that the people may collectively be the best judges of certain things, so it is justified for them to take part in deliberations. But like Plato, he feels that the common people are not qualified to share in the highest offices.Both Plato and Aristotle also agree that laws need to be made in accordance with the regime, and agree that the more just a ruler is, the more just the laws will be. Essentially, both Aristotle and Plato asserted that the goal of politics should be justice. One difference between them is that Plato believed that the best claim to rule was commandment and virtue, although he conceded that there is also a claim to rule establish on wealth and on numbers. Another difference is that Aristotle emphasized that the most important task for a leader was to be a lawgiver, and to draw up the appropriate constitution for the city-state.In Aristotles system, it was the leaders work to provide enduring laws, customs, and institutions for the citizens. According to Aristotle, once the constitution was in place, the ruler needed to take the necessary steps to maintain it, to implement reforms when he considered them necessary, a nd to guard against any subversion of the political system. Aristotles emphasis on a constitution bounds him apart from Plato, who considered philosopher kingship the best form of political rule. Aristotle described a constitution as a certain ordering of the inhabitants of the city-state, and as the way of life of the citizens.(Aristotle) He also speaks of the constitution of a lodge as the form of the compound and argues that whether the community is the same over measure depends on whether it has the same constitution. (Aristotle) It should be noted that despite the fact that Aristotles political views were influenced by Plato, he was very critical of the ideal city-state set forth in Platos Republic. He based his criticism on the grounds that Platos ideal city-state overvalued political unity, embraced a system of fabianism that was impractical and inimical to human nature, and neglected the happiness of the individual citizens.In contrast, in Aristotles view of the ideal St ate each and every citizen would possess moral virtue and the equipment to carry it out in practice, and thereby attain a life of excellence and complete happiness. All of the citizens would ease up political office and possess private property because one should invite the city-state happy not by looking at a part of it but at all the citizens. (Aristotle) In conclusion, the ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle were both concerned with identifying and promoting the best form of political association.In works such as the Republic and Politics, they used similar methods of analysis to evaluate the best form of political rule. For Aristotle, the best form of political rule corresponded to the best way of life for a human being. Since the best way of life is living nobly and according to virtue, the best political form of rule is the one which promotes this kind of life. For Plato, the best form of political rule was Aristocracy, for it involves rule by the best people in the political community. Bibliography Aristotle. Politics. New York capital of Delaware Publications, 2000. Plato. Republic. New York Viking Press, 1955.